#2152
- Created on2012-05-30 19:08
- Reported by
- StatusFixed
- PriorityNormal (3)
- Assigned to-
- Milestone
- Plan Level-
- Due Date-
Discuss if we need to reintroduce seed nodes
If so we should keep both:
- seed nodes (static list that is the same for all cluster members)
- node-to-join for dynamic more flexible node management
Question is if we then should let the deputy nodes become seed nodes - e.g. join them
- seed nodes (static list that is the same for all cluster members)
- node-to-join for dynamic more flexible node management
Question is if we then should let the deputy nodes become seed nodes - e.g. join them
Leave a comment
on 2012-06-07 11:37 *
By Patrik Nordwall
Also, should preferred deputy nodes be configureable, e.g. for placement in different data centers. Now it's n-nodes after the leader.
Updating tickets (#620, #679, #725, #750, #752, #753, #754, #763, #789, #870, #893, #922, #953, #954, #971, #977, #983, #985, #987, #991, #1026, #1045, #1051, #1060, #1061, #1084, #1098, #1099, #1133, #1134, #1135, #1136, #1137, #1194, #1225, #1226, #1243, #1245, #1247, #1248, #1254, #1261, #1300, #1317, #1391, #1412, #1791, #1793, #1901, #1908, #1911, #1912, #1913, #1914, #1915, #1916, #1917, #1922, #1983, #1987, #1996, #1997, #1998, #2066, #2077, #2105, #2117, #2133, #2143, #2149, #2151, #2152, #2153, #2155, #2157, #2158, #2159, #2160, #2161, #2162, #2163, #2164, #2165, #2167, #2171, #2175, #2176, #2177, #2180, #2182, #2184, #2185, #2193, #2199, #2202, #2204, #2206, #2207, #2209, #2210)