DOC: RemoteRouterConfig
(No description)
Leave a comment
on 2012-02-21 03:47 *
By viktorklang
For the record, I'm against RemoteRouterConfig since it breaks location transparency.
RemoteRouterConfig is a data container just as Props; which level are you objecting to?
Also, it doesn’t break anything, It just allows the programmatic configuration at the same level as .withDeploy(), i.e. only instantiation changes, nothing about communication does. It is really only adding a default for the case where there is no explicit configuration. Also, it is at the same level as specifying explicitly looked-up actors as routees, is it not?
And configuration always wins.
Also, it doesn’t break anything, It just allows the programmatic configuration at the same level as .withDeploy(), i.e. only instantiation changes, nothing about communication does. It is really only adding a default for the case where there is no explicit configuration. Also, it is at the same level as specifying explicitly looked-up actors as routees, is it not?
And configuration always wins.
on 2012-02-22 01:38 *
By rk@rkuhn.info
(In revision:ef0af0b47f9bcaa380a075be7d2f4b807a67eb18) document RemoteRouterConfig, see #1846
- fix Java API
- change to pass in Addresses so that validation happens earlier
Branch: wip-1846-RemoteRouterConfig-∂π
- fix Java API
- change to pass in Addresses so that validation happens earlier
Branch: wip-1846-RemoteRouterConfig-∂π
on 2012-02-22 01:44 *
By rk@rkuhn.info
(In revision:ef0af0b47f9bcaa380a075be7d2f4b807a67eb18) document RemoteRouterConfig, see #1846
- fix Java API
- change to pass in Addresses so that validation happens earlier
Branch: master
- fix Java API
- change to pass in Addresses so that validation happens earlier
Branch: master
on 2012-02-22 01:44 *
By viktorklang
(In revision:f1e12a8298d228f6a4037b5b397a5396f814b49b) Merge pull request #345 from jboner/wip-1846-RemoteRouterConfig-∂π
document RemoteRouterConfig, see #1846
Branch: master
document RemoteRouterConfig, see #1846
Branch: master
on 2012-02-22 01:54 *
By rk@rkuhn.info
(In revision:ef0af0b47f9bcaa380a075be7d2f4b807a67eb18) document RemoteRouterConfig, see #1846
- fix Java API
- change to pass in Addresses so that validation happens earlier
Branch: release-2.0
- fix Java API
- change to pass in Addresses so that validation happens earlier
Branch: release-2.0
on 2012-02-22 01:54 *
By viktorklang
(In revision:f1e12a8298d228f6a4037b5b397a5396f814b49b) Merge pull request #345 from jboner/wip-1846-RemoteRouterConfig-∂π
document RemoteRouterConfig, see #1846
Branch: release-2.0
document RemoteRouterConfig, see #1846
Branch: release-2.0
on 2012-02-25 03:31 *
By rk@rkuhn.info
(In revision:ef0af0b47f9bcaa380a075be7d2f4b807a67eb18) document RemoteRouterConfig, see #1846
- fix Java API
- change to pass in Addresses so that validation happens earlier
Branch: wip-stash
- fix Java API
- change to pass in Addresses so that validation happens earlier
Branch: wip-stash
on 2012-02-25 03:31 *
By viktorklang
(In revision:f1e12a8298d228f6a4037b5b397a5396f814b49b) Merge pull request #345 from jboner/wip-1846-RemoteRouterConfig-∂π
document RemoteRouterConfig, see #1846
Branch: wip-stash
document RemoteRouterConfig, see #1846
Branch: wip-stash