Package Tracks as a standalone application
First of all - nice application - really looks good and thank you for doing this and making it available to others.
Secondly, I looked at your roadmap and, to share my 2 cents worth - please think about doing the stand-alone sooner rather than later. I think GTD is going to be the only way I'm going to get myself more effective and efficient and I travel a lot (don't always have access to a web connection).
Again, thanks and I hope you enjoyed Brazil.
Secondly, I looked at your roadmap and, to share my 2 cents worth - please think about doing the stand-alone sooner rather than later. I think GTD is going to be the only way I'm going to get myself more effective and efficient and I travel a lot (don't always have access to a web connection).
Again, thanks and I hope you enjoyed Brazil.
Leave a comment
on 2005-10-30 12:14 *
By Anonymous
Status changed from New to Accepted
Status changed from New to Accepted
I'm ahead of you there :-) I found a relatively easy way to package up Tracks as a standalone application, so the next version will hopefully be distributed as both a standalone and server version. The only slight snag is that I can only compile standalones for different platforms on that platform, so I might need others to help with a Windows distribution.
although I am pretty sure that someone closer to the project already noticed, I want to point your attention on that: "Erik Veenstra has written a very cool guide on how to package Rails applications for easy distribution as native executables on Windows, OS X, and Linux":http://weblog.rubyonrails.com/archives/2005/10/08/distributing-rails-applications-easily
Yes, I know about that schilke, and I have used it fairly recently to make a standalone package on Mac OS X which worked really nicely. However, the changes in Rails 0.14.2 break the method. When I get a moment, I'm going to email Erik and see if he has any suggestions on how to work around.