ActorCell is the real thing, ActorContext is just the view which is exposed to the Actor.

Well, at second sight it may not actually be all that invalid. The reason given on the mailing list is that ActorCell should be an implementation detail which does not need to appear in the docs at all, and there is truth in that.

Push the source to Git.

(In revision:d56c0b4b340e3402025039ccc3c65b8bf81e5f6c) update ActorPath.png, see #2147

Branch: master

You got the bubbles right, but beneath them it still says ActorCell. Intended?

I also got the resolution wrong, but I'll return to this issue after fixing some completely unrelated breakage I just discovered.

Updating tickets (#520, #852, #857, #874, #935, #950, #1364, #1508, #1542, #1559, #1734, #1744, #1755, #1782, #1812, #1824, #1831, #1858, #1871, #1880, #1886, #1892, #1896, #1899, #1929, #1930, #1950, #1952, #1953, #1962, #1966, #1969, #1972, #1973, #1977, #1978, #1986, #1988, #1993, #1999, #2000, #2003, #2005, #2006, #2015, #2016, #2019, #2021, #2022, #2023, #2024, #2025, #2029, #2031, #2032, #2036, #2046, #2048, #2051, #2055, #2059, #2061, #2062, #2064, #2065, #2068, #2072, #2074, #2076, #2078, #2079, #2085, #2087, #2088, #2089, #2090, #2091, #2092, #2093, #2095, #2098, #2099, #2100, #2101, #2102, #2119, #2129, #2134, #2135, #2136, #2144, #2147, #2148, #2156, #2166, #2168, #2172, #2174, #2178, #2183)