-
Followers
AndreSomers (Assigned To) , Edwin_Horlings , ThomasGurney , jamesdawson , pvdbess
Attachments
11.5 MB Added by ThomasGurney on Jul 19 22:29 2010 UTC Details AssociationsNo associationsActivity
on Jul 16, 2010 @ 06:21PM UTC * By AndreSomers
Most remarkable result is that the unvalued result of both versions are not the same
on Jul 19, 2010 @ 10:29PM UTC * By ThomasGurney
Attachment 2010_19_07JaccardBUGTEST.mdb addedfile:c2Ii-CKZKr34XbeJe5cbCb: Test Jaccard table
on Jul 30, 2010 @ 07:27PM UTC * By AndreSomers
I have found (and fixed) a related bug in the new version. In this version, it could happen that the network was treated as valued even if you selected to treat it as unvalued!
This was made visible by the enabled logging of the application's events. I will continue testing to see if the output is correct in all cases now.
on Aug 13, 2010 @ 03:51PM UTC * By AndreSomers
Status changed from Accepted to TestTime ExpenditureLoading


Sorry - missed this mail first.
I'll try to send the data, but the file is big and I am in a place without good connections. May be it is easier to use the data of Edwin.
Round jaccard = choice which similarity is used from the raw jaccard query.
Ok, I understand the bug: in the old version all three are equal as they all were treated as unvalued.
In the new version this still the case for the roundjaccard and the unvalued. But not equal to the old unvalued one. May be the only problem in the new version is that you now do not correctly calclate the unvalued.
Best
Peter
Peter van den Besselaar
----------------------------
Professor
Organization Sciences, VU University Amsterdam
www.vandenbesselaar.net
-------------------------------------------------------
Rathenau Instituut / Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences professor of organization and dynamics of science
-------------------------------------------------------
(with my BlackBerry)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: André Somers <a.somers@rathenau.nl>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:13:33 +0200
To: Peter van den Besselaar<p.vandenbesselaar@rathenau.nl>; James Dawson<j.dawson@rathenau.nl>; Thomas Gurney<t.gurney@rathenau.nl>; 'edwin.horlings@gmail.com'<edwin.horlings@gmail.com>
Cc: Edwin Horlings<e.horlings@rathenau.nl>
Subject: RE: New version of NetworkTools
Peter,
Thanks for your thorough test! That is very helpful.
Could you please send me the dataset you worked on. I don't know what "rounded jaccard" is exactly.
As noted in the email, the new version fixes a bug where the value of the link was (sometimes?) not taken into account. That is: the network was treated as an unvalued network. That is obviously incorrect. It is strange however that the 'unvalued' version is not equal in both. I think this needs a bit more analysis.
André
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Peter van den Besselaar
Sent: 16 July 2010 09:57
To: André Somers; James Dawson; Thomas Gurney; 'edwin.horlings@gmail.com'
Cc: Edwin Horlings
Subject: RE: New version of NetworkTools
Dear all,
I tried the new version and it comes up with completely different community structures than the old did. I did therefore some testing.
1. Whereas the old version created 18 communities on the highest level, the new gives 50.
2. If the new one is correct, the analyses done with the old are wrong. James, what about chemistry and robotics? Edwin, was the esocialscience analysis done with the old version?
3. the old version gives the same outcomes using the jaccard, roundjaccard and unvalued
4. the new version gives the same for roundjaccard and unvalued, but a different one for valued.
Both seem therefore problematic!!
please comments!
best regards
peter
Previous version (round jaccard)
output stored in table [Articles communities 4]
number of nodes: 14537
number of connections: 555667
number of community levels: 4
community count overview:
level 1 : 14537
level 2 : 132
level 3 : 24
level 4 : 18
Previous version (jaccard)
output stored in table [Articles communities 5]
number of nodes: 14537
number of connections: 555667
number of community levels: 4
community count overview:
level 1 : 14537
level 2 : 132
level 3 : 24
level 4 : 18
Pevious version (unvalued)
output stored in table [Articles communities 9]
number of nodes: 14537
number of connections: 555667
number of community levels: 4
community count overview:
level 1 : 14537
level 2 : 132
level 3 : 24
level 4 : 18
new version (jaccard)
output stored in n [Articles communities 7]
number of nodes: 14537
number of connections: 555667
mber of community levels: 5
community count overview:
level 1 : 14537
level 2 : 1340
level 3 : 117
level 4 : 52
level 5 : 50
- new version (round jaccard)*
output stored in table [Articles communities 8]number of nodes: 14537
number of connections: 555667
number of community levels: 5
community count overview:
level 1 : 14537
level 2 : 1360
level 3 : 130
level 4 : 71
level 5 : 69
new version (unvalued)
output stored in table [Articles communities 10]
number of nodes: 14537
number of connections: 555667
number of community levels: 5
community count overview:
level 1 : 14537
level 2 : 1360
level 3 : 130
level 4 : 71
level 5 : 69